Clarice Navarro Ratzlaff, a former Colorado state representative and former congressional staffer, has become the subject of intense online and media attention following a sworn complaint filed with the U.S. House Committee on Ethics involving Rep. Lauren Boebert.
The complaint, filed by American Muckrakers founder David Wheeler on September 17, 2026, makes allegations concerning Boebert and three current or former congressional staffers, including Navarro Ratzlaff.
It is important to emphasize that a complaint is an allegation, not a finding of fact. Navarro Ratzlaff has denied the allegations, and Boebert has also rejected them. The House Ethics Committee has not publicly established the allegations as true.
That distinction is particularly important as social-media posts and headlines have rapidly amplified the story.
Who Is Clarice Navarro?
Clarice Navarro-Ratzlaff is a former Republican member of the Colorado House of Representatives, where she represented House District 47.
Public biographical records identify her as a Colorado politician with roots in Pueblo and Las Animas. She served in the Colorado House from 2013 until 2017, when she left the legislature for a position in the federal government.
Navarro subsequently worked in congressional politics, including in Rep. Lauren Boebert’s office.
LegiStorm’s congressional employment records identify Clarice Navarro-Ratzlaff as a congressional staffer and show employment records extending into January 2025.
What Is the New Ethics Complaint About?
The major development driving searches for Clarice Navarro is a sworn complaint submitted to the U.S. House Committee on Ethics.
According to media reports describing the filing, the complaint alleges that Boebert had inappropriate sexual relationships with three people who worked for her congressional operation.
The three individuals named in reports about the complaint are:
- Clarice Navarro Ratzlaff, identified as a former district director
- Raven Finegan, identified as a current or former chief of staff
- Jeffrey Small, identified as a former chief of staff
The complaint alleges that the relationships occurred while the individuals worked under Boebert’s supervision.
However, the allegations remain allegations.
The U.S. House Committee on Ethics describes itself as a bipartisan standing committee with jurisdiction over the House Code of Official Conduct and provides procedures for ethics complaints and investigations.
What Does the Complaint Allege About Clarice Navarro?
According to reporting on the complaint, Navarro Ratzlaff is alleged to have had a sexual relationship with Boebert during the period when she worked as Boebert’s district director.
Reports say the complaint places the alleged relationship between approximately 2021 and January 2025.
The complaint also reportedly alleges that Navarro Ratzlaff received approximately $200,000 in a payment that the filer characterized as an effort to prevent an ethics complaint.
These claims have attracted significant attention online, but the payment allegation should not be presented as an established fact. Reporting on the complaint says that portions of the supporting material are redacted or rely on sources described by the filer.
Clarice Navarro’s Response
Navarro Ratzlaff has strongly denied the allegations.
According to reporting published September 20, she characterized the allegations as false and defamatory and rejected the claims concerning her alleged relationship with Boebert as well as the reported payment.
That denial is a central part of the developing story and should be included whenever the allegations are reported.
Lauren Boebert Responds
Rep. Lauren Boebert has also rejected the allegations.
Her representative described the accusations as “utterly false,” according to multiple reports. Boebert has denied having inappropriate relationships with her staff and rejected the allegations contained in the complaint.
As of September 20, 2026, the public reporting available for this article does not establish that the allegations in the complaint have been substantiated by the House Ethics Committee.
What Happens to a House Ethics Complaint?
The House Ethics Committee is responsible for handling ethics matters involving House members and employees under its jurisdiction.
A complaint being filed does not automatically mean that the allegations have been proven.
The committee can review information and determine what additional steps, if any, are appropriate. The existence of a complaint should therefore be distinguished from a formal finding of misconduct.
Readers should watch for future announcements directly from the House Committee on Ethics rather than relying solely on social-media posts or commentary.
Clarice Navarro Career Background
Before becoming a nationally discussed figure in the current controversy, Navarro had an established political career in Colorado.
Public records identify her as a former Republican state representative for Colorado House District 47. She served from 2013 to 2017.
Earlier in her career, available biographical information identifies work in education and other professional roles.
Her state legislative career included multiple election victories before she left the Colorado House in 2017.
Clarice Navarro and Lauren Boebert: What Is Confirmed?
The safest way to understand the developing story is to separate documented background from disputed allegations.
| Question | Current information |
|---|---|
| Did Clarice Navarro work in congressional politics? | Yes. Public congressional employment records document her federal staff work. |
| Was she a Colorado state representative? | Yes. She represented Colorado House District 47. |
| Is her name in a new ethics complaint? | Yes, according to current reporting. |
| Does the complaint make allegations involving Boebert and Navarro? | Yes. |
| Has Navarro denied the allegations? | Yes. |
| Has Boebert denied the allegations? | Yes. |
| Have the allegations been established as fact? | No such finding is established in the sources reviewed for this article. |
What Readers Should Watch Next
The next major development will likely depend on whether the House Ethics Committee takes further action concerning the complaint.
Important developments to monitor include:
- Any public statement from the House Ethics Committee
- Whether an investigative process is announced
- Any additional documentation supporting or challenging the allegations
- Further statements from Clarice Navarro Ratzlaff
- Further statements from Lauren Boebert
- Any clarification regarding the alleged $200,000 payment
- Whether additional witnesses or documents become public
Until those developments occur, readers should treat claims contained in the complaint as unproven allegations.
Clarice Navarro : Key Takeaway
The sudden surge in interest surrounding Clarice Navarro Ratzlaff is primarily connected to a newly reported House ethics complaint involving Rep. Lauren Boebert.
The complaint makes serious allegations involving Navarro and other former or current staffers, but Navarro has denied the allegations and Boebert has also rejected them.
At this stage, the most important distinction for readers is between the existence of the complaint and the truth of the allegations contained within it.
As the House Ethics Committee and the people involved respond, additional documentation could provide more information about what happened and whether any formal investigation or finding follows.
For now, the story remains a developing ethics controversy rather than an established finding against Navarro Ratzlaff.